Here are the Maximum Operational Values from the IN-18 datasheet (full copy attached):
So I wouldn't say that he is running out of spec, at least not in any significant way.
From his writeup (again, not perfectly clear), it seems that he was trying to accomplish 3 things:
1. Increase tube life
2. Maintain digit brightness
3. Avoid cathode poisoning
And he claims that he did:
"At the same time the brightness of the tubes using this scheme did not affect the brightness!
So at the end the lifespan of the tubes finally increased SIGNIFICANTLY in comparison to the manufacturers statements!!!"
Based on his clock, one of which I own, I certainly cannot refute his claims. I just thought it was an interesting and novel approach - perhaps a bit "out of the box."
For me, and for this thread, I was obviously associating his approach with the IN-18s as a possible solution to my IN-8 brightness issues in the Classic Rev6 multiplexed design.
Thanks again to all for the valuable comments and insights!!