The paper refers to tubes that are "specifically engineered for this type of display". I followed up on the citations and got here (
). The application note states "until recently, the high peak currents required caused ionization to spread beyond the numeral to the leads and the pins. This extraneous glow within the tubes resulted in a generally poor aesthetic appearance of the display". It doesn't make any mention of any other deleterious effects (though that doesn't mean there aren't any).
The note goes on to explain that the high peak currents are required to maintain the brightness of the display.
The Z5600M data sheet specifies a continuous current of around 1mA and a pulse current of around 10mA. I might assume(!), therefore, that these tubes could also be safely driven by a multiplexed method that adjusted the current to maintain brightness,
Power supply voltage, V 200 -
Anode current, at pulsed voltage: (50 Hz), mA (median) 2 to 4
Anode current, at rectified voltage: mA 4 to 8
So. All things considered, I now side with Ty (is that your name? Apologies if not) when it comes to IN-18s, or anything that does not explicitly specify a higher pulse current.
Subjectively, I have not noticed any difference between my multiplexed IN-14 displays and my direct drive IN-14 displays, in terms of brightness, flicker or glow leakage. I suspect that if the current is limited to that stated in the data sheets, there is not a problem. I will let Ian comment on whether or not that is the case with his current (no pun intended) hardware.
It would be an interesting experiment to run the IN-1s with a variety of activation schemes to test for glow leakage and for tube lifetime:
Plain direct drive.
Dimmable direct drive.
Multiplexed and staying within current limits.
Multiplexed and not staying within current limits.
Dimmable/Multiplexed and staying within current limits.
Dimmable/Multiplexed and not staying within current limits.
Regarding the post directly above... you dug up something useful that I've never seen before: some real citations regarding multiplex, and most interesting (to me because it sort of backs up one of my assertions) is the paper in which they state "specifically engineered for this type of display". Good finds!
I agree with you that the Z5600M is a good candidate for successful multiplexing, given that they include a spec for pulsed current and it's higher than the continuous current spec. Stands to reason they had multiplexing in mind when they came up with the spec. I would imagine this holds true for any data sheet being read in its original language that gives a pulse current value that is substantially greater than the continuous current value.
I suspect that the IN-18 datasheet has lost something in translation but not being a Russian speaker I have no proof - only an ASSumption. I'm assuming that "Anode current, at pulsed voltage: (50 Hz), mA (median) 2 to 4" is talking about poorly filtered half wave DC that ripples severely (pulsates?) at mains frequency. Is it too far fetched to think the datasheet dates back to a time when the Nixies might well be fed from a selenium rectifier or even a vacuum tube rectifier?
Yes, my name is Ty, the Eeberfest part is a made up word I use a lot on the Internet. Eeberfest = a slightly less harsh (and highly technical) term for a clusterfuck.
Writing style, okay no problem. There is so much pertinent info missing when discussing things in text as opposed to face-to-face that it's hard for me to gauge attitude and intent sometimes.
In the video clip I was seeing flicker watching it on a desktop PC using the embedded YouTube player. I tried it later on a phone, again using the embedded player, and the flicker was still there but much less noticeable. Watching it now directly on YouTube seems the same as watching on the embedded player.
Look into it later when the dust is clearing off the crater.
1 year 9 months ago - 1 year 9 months ago#7522by judge
There is an interesting discussion going on over on neonixie-l about IN-18 failures on Spectrum kits. In it, Manuel Azevedo observes that older spectrum kits apparently heal failing tubes in newer spectrum kits. I guess there is an optimum current to use here that balances cathode poising with sputtering. It also makes me wonder if a better way of performing ACP would be to boost the current to all the tubes for a while (while displaying all the digits). Of course, I have no idea what would be involved in making a current controlled power supply, so this is easy for me to say!
I finally read about getters while I was making sure I had some idea of what I was saying in this post. Now I understand a bit more about what Dalibor was doing in his making a Nixie tube video. I also found another wonderful article about the complexities of tube design
. If you ever wondered what all that stuff inside the tube was for, it is worth a read.
from the same site that describes the theory of operation in terms that I can understand!
1 year 7 months ago - 1 year 7 months ago#7679by Ian
I don't see it as "bashing" at all, and I think it's totally on topic: It's a natural discussion topic because lots of people use the Spectrum as their "reference" implementation of a large format direct drive clock, and you can only compare what you have in common and where there is a large enough sample size to gain some information with a fair level of significance. Name me one other clock where the majority of people could say "oh yeah, I have one of those, and it does that as well/doesn't do that any more/never did that".
It comes down to the fact that if there are problems (blue spot, poisoning), you can't achieve much without comparison with the experience of others.
If the Supertex HV chips were not designed for Nixies, perhaps there is a problem that needs solving. If the old Spectrum doesn't poison and the new one does, (an observation, but not based on data at this point), what is the Cause? Do we have to collect more data to see that there really is a difference between old and new Spectrum? Has something happened to the HV? Is it the HV, or is it something that changed betweem the old and the new Spectrum? Is it just the Spectrum or do other HV direct drive clocks also have this problem? Is the problem in the tubes? If there is a problem, can it be mitigated?
Many questions. Few answers, and I'm glad that others are thinking about it as well, because perhaps with the introduction of a Zener or a resistor or something we're all good again, and that would only serve to feedback to an improvement in the Spectrum, so everyone wins in the end.
Last Edit: 1 year 7 months ago by Ian. Reason: typo